Internet


8
May 07

Sponsored Review: Apogee Search

Disclosure:
This is a paid review which I am doing as a Review Me participant. Although there will potentially be a financial gain from this review, this post will not be biased in favor of any potential financial gain.

Apogee Search is a Search Engine Marketing firm founded in 2001 by McKinsey & Co. alumni. The main focus area of the firm is affiliate marketing and pay-per-call. The main goal of Apogee is to direct targeted visitors to B2B and B2C websites.

Services:

So, what services does Apogee provide? In layman’s terms, the goal is to bring people who do a search on a search engine to a website where what they are looking for is potentially sold. The buzzword complete description of that is “qualified leads from ready to buy customers”. For that to happen, from what I understand, you get in touch with a representative who analysis your website for search engine marketing. The search engine marketing analysis service is supposed to be free. If you accept, Apogee positions itself as a partner to you and “help you get the most from your marketing dollar and quickly raise your search marketing revenues to the next level”.

I can hear you being confused about my tone about the service here. It is not that I don’t see any value in such services. I am sure search engine marketing is a big part of the traffic to a commerce site and being discovered among many similar websites is very important. So, I think that such a service should be valuable for a website who wants to attract potential customers.

Apogee seems to provide six different services:

  1. Paid Search Advertising: Pay-per-click campaigns. Mainly translates into Google Adwords.
  2. Natural Search Engine Optimization: Plain SEO.
  3. Pay Per Call Management: This service kind of turns customer clicks to voice meaning customers are directed to seller’s phones and they pay as they are called.
  4. Affiliate Marketing: Seems like Apogee brings affiliate partner sites together with their client to increase their revenues.
  5. Search Engine Marketing Training: This is interesting since they claim to give hands-on instructions about SEM best practices.
  6. Search Engine Marketing Analysis: As I mentioned, this is a free service where the client’s website is analyzed for search engine performance.

Website:

Apogee Search website contains some information about search engine marketing among all those buzzword compliant advertisement clich?s.

One thing that I really liked about the website after my inspections is that they provide many documents that could help the customer answer some questions about SEO and SEM. They also provide an article called “Avoid Search Engine Marketing Malpractice” to warn clients for not falling into such a malpractice. Another interesting article that attracts attention is the “PPC: Do You Want to Play Inside or Outside?” which discusses outsourcing pay-per-click campaigns.

Their current blog also gives a positive image to them.

Conclusion:

I tried to review the Apogee Search Engine Marketing firm. Although I have not tried their services and I am not a potential client for them at this point, I tried to write up an objective review trying to understand if they would be a useful partner. It is difficult to make that assessment without trying but the fact that they provide many downloadable resources to help the client understand the concepts of the partnership made me feel they are worth a look if you are looking for such a service.

[tags]sponsored review[/tags]


23
Apr 07

Google is Turning into Microsoft

I think Google is turning into Microsoft day by day. No, it is not because they are growing insanely. No, it is not because they are becoming evil (may be they are but not related to this post). It is because they are becoming very boring with their branding. Last week Google killed the product search service Froogle’s brand and renamed it to “Google Product Search”. They say Froogle name did not describe what the product does. Probably true but did Google mean web search? No, but it means web search now among other things. How did Klenex become synanomous with facial tissue? Yes, you got it now, right? So, I don’t buy this argument. I am thinking Google is becoming the next Microsoft.


22
Mar 07

Onion to Launch Video Site

I just learned that the satirical newspaper Onion will launch a video site called Onion News Network. The content will be a parodical view of 24 hour news networks like CNN, MSNBC, and others.

There is more information in the WSJ article (free). Below is the promotional video (a good sign is that it can be embedded) that is on the Onion web site.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

[tags]news, internet video, onion [/tags]


21
Mar 07

Bum rush the charts tomorrow

Tomorrow, on March 22nd 2007 podcasters will send a message to the music industry. The goal is to make the indie group Black Lab to #1 on the iTunes list.

All you need to do is to spend couple minutes of your time and $0.99 to buy the Black Lab song “Mine Again” using the image link above. To learn more about this social movement check this page out.

Technorati Tags: ,

[tags]bum rush the charts, indie music movement[/tags]


13
Mar 07

Viacom Sues YouTube

You remember when Viacom demanded YouTube to pull more than 100.000 videos, right? As far as I remember, YouTube tried to comply with this demand and removed many clips from the site.

However, this must have not been enough for Viacom since today they announced that they sued YouTube for a total of 1 billion dollars for a “massive intentional copyright infringement”. I think “massive” and “intentional” are the interesting words in this quote.

Continue reading →


9
Mar 07

Turkey Lifts YouTube Ban

Today I learned from Turkish blogs that YouTube is accessible from Turkey again. I am glad that a bad decision is reversed but I do not think this is going to make things any better. There has been a lot of negative coverage of the news all over the blogs and I think the damage is done. The lift of the ban did not cause as much discussion as the ban itself as expected. Here is the AP story and Techdirt’s take on the issue. There is also the opinion of The 463 that I was able to find.

An interesting question that came to my attention lately is who removed the videos first: YouTube or the creator of the video. As most people I thought it was YouTube who immediately removed the clip but turns out that the clip was removed by the uploader not YouTube.

I also learned this morning from a comment on my blog in Turkish that someone Turkish created a video in response to the offending one. I think it is a good one among all those stupid and possibly equally offending responses from Turkish people.

So, the ban is gone but the impression that Turkey is a country that restricts free expression remains.

Technorati Tags: , ,

[tags] youtube, turkey, censorship, law, legislation[/tags]